United States District Court, Central District of California
Opinions and Orders of Previous Years

Subject: Case Number:Title:Date Posted:
Opinions and Orders of Previous Years CV 96-6545 AHM (RNBx) Bradley Cagle, et al. vs. The Cooper Companies, et al. - Rulings on Defendants’ Motions in Limine and Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Adjudication05/13/2004

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


In Re: Silicone Gel Breasts Implants Products Liability Litigation
___________________________________________

BRADLEY CAGLE, as Administrator of the Estate of TONI J. CAGLE, and BRADLEY HOUSTON CAGLE, JR., an infant under the age of fourteen, by BRADLEY CAGLE, his father and natural guardian,
Plaintiffs,
vs.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 96-6545 AHM (RNBx)

RULINGS ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION


Click the attachment below to download. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In Re: Silicone Gel Breasts Implants Products Liability Litigation BRADLEY CAGLE, as Administrator of the Estate of TONI J. CAGLE, and BRADLEY HOUSTON CAGLE, JR., an infant under the age of fourteen, by BRADLEY CAGLE, his father and natural guardian,
Plaintiffs,

vs. THE COOPER COMPANIES, et al.,
Defendants. ) Case No. CV 96-6545 AHM (RNBx) RULINGS ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION


Click the attachment below to download.

File for Download:
File Type: Adobe Acrobat

CV96-6545AHM.pdf

File Size: 303 KBytes